The Great Gatsby - Review by Stu
For the most part I try to watch films
with an open mind and no expectations. But when I first heard that Baz Luhrmann
would be directing The Great Gatsby I instantly knew that I wouldn’t
enjoy it. I know that sounds narrow-minded but I’ve never warmed to his style
of storytelling – like a comedian that I never found funny. I just don’t care
for his flashy sequences and manic camera techniques.
I found The Great Gatsby to be a bloated, self-indulgent and hollow film.
I found The Great Gatsby to be a bloated, self-indulgent and hollow film.
I don’t understand how Baz Luhrmann gets
by doing the same old shtick. He’s renowned for his visual flair and unique
cinematic vision but he hasn’t done anything new in his past few films. It all
just comes across as unrestrained flashiness to me. What’s more, his visual
style rarely assists the story or character development. I feel as though he’s
prepared to sacrifice the effectiveness of a scene in order to present pure
spectacle.
The story of The Great Gatsby is quite
compelling – but we have F. Scott Fitzgerald to thank for that. It was last
brought to the big screen in 1974 in a film which starred Robert Redford and
Mia Farrow. The question must then be asked: was another version required? I
say maybe, but not by Baz Luhrmann, since he basically traces around the lines
of the previous one, but without half the emotional gravitas. I have no problem
with remakes, but what I would prefer is that film makers at least put a new
spin on the story instead of merely coughing up a computer-graphic-laden inferior
copy. Sure this can now be the ‘The Great Gatsby’ for our generation, but does
that mean that every 30 years or so we’ll have to stocktake the library and re-skin
the old classics? Of course not, unless Hollywood is trying to convince us that
they’ve run out of fresh ideas once again.
On a positive note, the performances in
The Great Gatsby are fun and accomplished, if not superb. The highlight for me
was Joel Edgerton as Tom Buchanan. He easily matched his more seasoned co-stars
Leonardo DiCarprio (as Jay Gatsby) and Toby Maguire (as Nick Carraway). The big
letdown was Carey Mulligan, from whom I expected big things, but who unfortunately
just phoned in her best wide-eyed-tweety-bird-dream-girl routine as Daisy
Buchanan. As is usually the case when directors focus more on visuals than
performances (paging Mr Lucas!), I felt that many scenes lacked the emotional punch
that was required to make them memorable. Surprisingly, the best scene of the
film occurred in Nick Carraway’s cramped house, in which he is hosting a
morning tea for Gatsby and Daisy. It’s the only time Luhrmann took his foot of
the pedal long enough to let the scene breathe and let the actors have a few
moments to show off their craft. Noticeably, the scene contained very little dialogue
and more traditional camera angles. I just wish there was more of it throughout
the film.
Maybe it’s my bias bubbling to the
surface but this film just wasn’t for me. If you like Luhrmann’s work you’ll
probably get a real kick out of it. Sadly, I just got what I was expecting.
"I instantly knew that I wouldn’t enjoy it"
ReplyDeleteAnd this pretentious dribble is why I know that the more a movie is panned by "critics", the more likely Joe Public will enjoy it.
I tend to disagree, Anonymous. Neither Stu nor I claim to be "critics". We ARE Joe Public. Just a couple of cinema goers who document our thoughts on what we see. Furthermore, in no way would I ever brand Stu as being pretentious. Sure, he's a film geek with an opinion which ends up on a website but a review without opinion would be worthless.
ReplyDeleteWhile I appreciate your dislike for pretentiousness in the film critiquing biz, I also think that there's validity to the claim that all people enter films with a certain expectation. If you don't like Luhrmann's style, you won't like The Great Gatsby just as if you don't like Tarantino's style, you won't like Django etc. Regardless, if you manage to see the film yourself, I hope that you enjoy it.